Here is the leader comment


Park Way bridge fines are not illegal say council

Reporter: James Williams Reporter

Contact: 01635 886633

Park Way bridge Newbury 04-2312EWEST Berkshire Council has said its decision to introduce a bus lane on Park Way bridge is legal, after claims that the fines were unlawful.

The bridge was turned into a bus, taxi and bicycle lane (pictured) on November 4, 2011.

The council has confirmed that 6,184 fines were imposed in the first year of the bus lane being introduced. However, 104 of these fines were cancelled at appeal.

The fines, which are £30 each if paid within 14 days, rising to £60 thereafter, generated £170,000 for the council in the first year.

One motorist who was fined, Barrie Singleton, from Newbury, argues that the council’s charges are illegal because they incorrectly state the bridge is on Parkway, not Park Way.

“You cannot mis-state the location of the alleged charge. Parkway is a shopping centre, not a road,” Mr Singleton said.

“I assert it is immaterial whether the council’s signage was apparently legal, it was manifestly ineffective from the outset.

“By law there should be a dotted line with bus lane written in it before the solid line, so as motorists approach the bridge they can break out of the lane,” He added.

Former Chieveley resident, Regine Parkinson, aged 67, who was caught driving over the bridge last year also claims the council’s signage is inadequate.

“I was making the usual visit to Newbury, always park at Camp Hopson. There was not prior warning that things had changed, the actual sign was not at all pointing the way to make it clear.

“I bet if you did a survey on drivers, which way they were booked going over the bridge, most of them would have come from Camp Hopson car park. The council know how to catch people, there should have been a sign from Camp Hopson to say what the situation was,” Mrs Parkinson added.

However spokeswoman for West Berkshire Council, Peta Stoddart-Crompton said the council’s signage and fines were legal.

“An offence is committed if a vehicle travels in any part of the bus lane and the camera takes photographs of both the vehicle and its number plate to confirm that the offence has been committed. The bridge is situated within the bus lane and within Park Way. It is not therefore the case that such a bridge does not exist. Legally it is immaterial whether the penalty charge notice says Park Way or Parkway as it can clearly be proven that the offence has been committed using the photographs and because the difference is negligible.

“The traffic signs and road markings on the approaches to and over the bridge fully conform to the Traffic Signs and General Directions 2002, the regulations that the council is required to comply with. However, the signs provided go beyond the statutory requirement.”

The council said no motorists had challenged its Park Way bridge bus lane charges in court.

Last February, three months after the bus lane was introduced, West Berkshire Council cancelled a number of fines after it emerged that the signage had not been properly illuminated after dark.

Don't forget to read the Newbury Weekly News — Berkshire's largest–selling local newspaper — out each Thursday morning.


Add your thoughts.

The comments have not been moderated.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of or publishers Newbury News Limited.

  1. kered

    January 9, 2013 9:10 am

    Why are these people who have been caught using park way bridge
    moaning, and trying to get off the fine on a technicality saying it’s an illegal fine because of the spelling of park way or parkway, or wrong signage
    there can’t be a motorist in Newbury who dosn’t know the bridge is for buses and taxis only.
    and only a stranger to Newbury might turn right out of camp hobsons car park by mistake.
    So,all you drivers out there who don’t want the fine. don’t do the crime.

    Report this comment

  2. John C

    January 9, 2013 6:49 pm

    Weather its legal or not they are not likely to admit to it are they. They only problem I have that it was replaced by council tax funds for far less use than the old bridge had.

    Report this comment


To post a comment you must login.

Forgot your password?

Register for this site

By registering you will be able to to post comments on news stories. Simply choose a username and enter your email address and we'll send you a password to login to the site.

Lose something?

Enter your username or email to reset your password.

Leave a Reply

This site uses cookies. Find out more about this site’s cookies.