go

Most vulnerable could be hit by cuts 'double whammy'

Council blasted for proposing to increase council tax while cutting support

Dan Cooper

Reporter:

Dan Cooper

Contact:

01635 886632

Council tax set to rise by four per cent from April

SOME of the most vulnerable people in the district are set to be hit by a ‘double whammy’, with West Berkshire Council set to increase council tax while at the same time looking to reduce the level of support it provides.

The proposals are part of the council’s plan to save £8m next year.

In addition to raising council tax by 3.99 per cent for the second successive year, the proposals include cutting funding to Citizens Advice – the first port of call for many with financial concerns – by almost 30 per cent. 

Citizens Advice has already had to close for appointments on a Thursday afternoon, after having its funding cut by 25 per cent this year.

And although next year’s proposed £60,000 cut is not a given just yet, the charity’s chief executive Jan Rothwell said: “Of course we are very worried about the proposals.

“It would have a massive impact on our ability to deliver services if it was to go ahead. We can’t yet say what that is likely to be.”

In its own impact assessment, the council admits: “A further reduction in core funding will potentially impact on the small number of paid staff, which could then impact on the number of volunteer advisers that CAB can support. 

“This will mean fewer advisers on existing sessions or fewer sessions.

“The effect of both will be to reduce accessibility of advice to the public.”

And to rub salt into the wounds, thousands of people could receive less help with their bills if proposed changes to the Council Tax Reduction Scheme goes ahead.

Another proposal is to start charging £703 a year for children over the age of 16 with special educational needs (SEN) or disabilities to get the bus to school – a service that is currently provided free of charge.

The council admits this will have a financial impact on families and says there are no exceptions for families on low incomes.

Lee Dillon (Lib Dem, Thatcham North) said: “If you have a child with SEN you might have to reduce your hours at work to help look after them, and to find £700 is not easy.”

An increase in parking charges and reduced funding for road safety is also on the cards in the latest proposals.

The council says that, by cutting the road safety budget, a number of road safety activities could either reduce or stop entirely.

This may include visits to schools and support for national campaigns.

Mr Dillon added: “It is proposed to cut drainage maintenance, which was a major contributing factor to flooding we had in 2007, 2014, and the flash flood only a few weeks ago.

“It means more standing water will be on roads, but at the same time the council is looking to cut the budget for road safey.”

The council is being forced to make the savings after having its government grant cut year on year.

This year, the council had to find £17.5m of savings after having its grant cut by 44 per cent.

Leave your comment

Share your opinions on Newbury Weekly News

Characters left: 1000

Article comments

  • Oldmoaner

    22/11/2016 - 16:04

    Although I am not apposed to paying a slightly higher Council tax I think it is about time to take a real look at how West Berkshire Council spends this money. I do not want the sheriff of Newbury taking the money from the poor to finance developers wasted bridges, road junctions and continually increasing the pollution of the Town. It should be used to support the people that pay it not increasing Planning, Roads and Transport, Vision and many other developer led sections within WBC. We could save a lot of money by amalgamating councils with Reading and doing away with one lot of senior managers and directors.

    Reply

  • NewburyDenizen

    22/11/2016 - 13:01

    Hmm, more money disappearing to tax, no surprises there

    Reply

  • PhilW

    22/11/2016 - 09:09

    Time for another poll - cuts in services or a 10% increase in council tax, which would readers prefer?

    Reply

    • NewburyLad

      22/11/2016 - 10:10

      How about a poll asking exactly how much more they are prepared to pay AND which areas of council spending need to raised or lowered. For example would they be prepared to pay 15% more or just 1% more, and would they like to see, for example increases in "Children's Services" and "Adult Social Care" and less on "Highways & Transport" ? If 20 choices asking which is the best takeaway in Newbury can appear on this website, I am sure they can do 3 polls - one with percentage increases 1%, 2%, 5% etc, and two more listing the main council services with "increase/decrease" choices.

      Reply

    • Johnny Gaunt

      22/11/2016 - 10:10

      They've done it Phil!

      Reply

      • PhilW

        22/11/2016 - 16:04

        So I see John - so far 40% seem to want it both ways, no cuts, no tax hike - dreaming that efficiency savings are all that is needed. Shame they included that option because it's really down to pay for it through taxes or lose it.

        Reply

News

road ahead closed
Home

Road closure in Great Shefford

Works expected to take up to four days

 
Sculptor gets go-ahead for bronze statue of Jack of Newbury
Home

Sculptor gets go-ahead for bronze statue of Jack of Newbury

Permission granted to commemorate one of towns most famous residents

 
All Districts

Rider hurt as horse bolts

 
News

Lib Dems blast plans for cuts

 
News

Parliamentary approval for pub chef