go

Hampshire County Council reveals bill for temporary waste permits

Administrative, postage and other costs not included

Jane Meredith

Reporter:

Jane Meredith

Contact:

01635 886637

Waste war rumbles on as West Berkshire permit scheme revealed

HAMPSHIRE County Council will have to pay £166,221 to enable its residents to use Newbury’s recycling facilities.

The figure was revealed following a Freedom of Information request from the Newbury Weekly News, sister paper of Newburytoday.

A total of 5,037 temporary passes have been issued to date at a cost of £33 each.

However, the council was unable to say if it had incurred any additional costs in regards to administration, printing, postage and councillors’ expenses.

North Hampshire villagers close to the county border were banned from using West Berkshire’s recycling centres in Newtown Road, Newbury, and at Padworth, after West Berkshire Council introduced a permit scheme in September 2016.

This followed Hampshire County Council’s withdrawal of a £200,000 payment to West Berkshire Council to allow its residents to use the facilities across the border.

It was also revealed, at a North Hampshire meeting last week,  that the entire parish of Ashmansworth, which includes Crux Easton, has yet to receive any temporary waste permits.

Chairman of Ashmansworth Parish Council Alan Cox said:

“There was a long delay in vouchers being issued, but then we did not receive any at all – the only parish excluded,” said Mr Cox.

Despite being situated between Andover and Newbury, said Mr Cox, the majority of villagers had closer links with Newbury:

“I accept that a few of our houses are just under the 10-mile limit (and it does depend on which route is taken), but the majority of our 83 houses are over 10 miles away by road, some over 12 miles.

“There is a feeling that, in our remote area, we do not benefit from many services, and this one has now been taken away from us.”

While he understood councils were under pressure to make financial savings, Mr Cox said the efforts to save money were costing the taxpayer more in administrative costs. 

Leave your comment

Share your opinions on Newbury Weekly News

Characters left: 1000

Article comments

  • NWN_reader

    09/02/2017 - 16:04

    So, doing the maths, Hampshire only saved £33,779 over what they were paying West Berkshire previously. Once the cost of cleaning up the extra fly tipping in Hampshire and West Berkshire is taken into consideration I'm sure both Councils will be worse off financially than they were before they introduced this new harebrained scheme.

    Reply

News

Newbury man takes on drinks giant in trademark dispute
News

Newbury man takes on drinks giant in trademark dispute

War veteran's bid to launch new business scuppered by Monster's claim

1comment

 
Home found for Second World War glider crate
News

Home found for Second World War relic

Piece of history recovered from Thatcham garden set for new museum

 
News

A happy 100th birthday to you Maisie

 
News

Bid to use hall as Newbury homeless shelter

3comments