go

West Berkshire's school transport system branded ‘unfair’

Parent slams service that is free to some while others pay hundreds of pounds

Chris Ord

Reporter:

Chris Ord

Contact:

01635 886639

West Berkshire Council logo

WEST Berkshire Council’s method for determining which pupils are entitled to free home-to-school transport has this week been branded “unfair”.

As the new school term gets under way, some families are now being forced to pay hundreds of pounds to get their children to class, following the council’s decision to implement changes to the service.

At the start of this term, the council’s proposals came into effect, which has resulted in the cost of a bus pass for some parents increasing from £250 to more than £700.

The free service is still available to some pupils, depending on their parents’ income and the distance to their closest school.

One parent, Phil Gray from Woolhampton, told the Newbury Weekly News he has had to pay £500 for his son’s bus pass as he moves into Year 7 at Theale Green School.

The disgruntled father said, because the school is more than three miles away and is also the catchment school, he mistakenly believed his son would be entitled to free home to school transport.

“My application was rejected on the basis that the closest school is The Hurst School in Hampshire,” explained Mr Gray.

“The Hurst is the closest school to me if you have a helicopter or if you are brave enough to walk along the back roads in the dark and wet, because that’s the only way to get there if you don’t have a car or if you work.”

“You could go via public transport, but this involves two buses and crossing the A4 at a point where there are no crossing points.

“The journey is approximately 12 miles and takes about an hour-and-a-quarter either way.”

Had he attended The Hurst, Mr Gray’s son would be entitled to free transport as there is no safe walking route, but he said the taxi service would preclude his son from attending any after-school activities.

He added: “Am I going to send my child to a school that we don’t know, which is miles away from his friends, with no public transport links and precludes any after-school activities?

“Of course I’m not.

“West Berks are cynically manipulating the rules to avoid any responsibility as they know I’m not going to send my son there, and yet that’s the only option available – no negotiation, no common sense and no respect for taxpayers’ money, as they are prepared to pay for a taxi, which costs a lot more than the fare to Theale.”

West Berkshire Council spokes-woman Peta Stoddart-Crompton said the council had “a clear home-to-school transport policy which is applied evenly and fairly across all applications”.

Earlier this year, two petitions gained hundreds of signatures urging the council to rethink the changes.

Responding at the time, the council said the changes would only affect children who go to their catchment school, but who live geographically closer to another school and were necessary as the council was no longer able to subsidise the service for these pupils.

Leave your comment

Share your opinions on Newbury Weekly News

Characters left: 1000

Article comments

  • Essex

    14/09/2017 - 23:11

    www.facebook.com/schooltransportcuts www.twitter.com/essexstc

    Reply

  • Essex

    14/09/2017 - 23:11

    Hello West Berkshire parents. We in Essex are sadly further down the road with this savage policy. We won support from the Local Government Ombudsman who criticised the way the policy was implemented and won compensation. Sadly the policy continues although it's not saving money. Feel free to join our facebook and twitter page. Essex Against School Transport Cuts and you'll see all the things we have and are trying to overturn it.

    Reply

  • PhilG

    13/09/2017 - 11:11

    This is response I was expecting from WBC, it doesn't address the fundamental problem which is their method of measurement for the distance to the school. It takes no account of how you would actually get there i.e. Public transport links, walking routes etc. Other semi rural authorities have addressed the problem by including catchment schools over 3 miles away in their free transport policy. The number of families that are adversely effected is relatively small so the financial impact on the council would be minimal where as the impact on the families is disproportionately high. If you live in the Reading end of the catchment area school buses are provided, the cost has been reduced by £50 to £350 per year. Perhaps I'm being cynical now but maybe there are more voters in built up areas rather than in semi rural communities.

    Reply

  • MaryP

    12/09/2017 - 10:10

    I'm afraid I totally agree with this article. We have to pay over £700 in bus fees for our son to attend his catchment school - let's remind West Berks that this is the school THEY designate for him. If every parent using the bus service had to pay (which I understand and accept as the Government doesn't have limitless resources) then our bill would be significantly reduced to a manageable amount. It would also be a fair service rather than people who live practically 200m away from us receiving free transport. An unjust system built on outdated rules with unfair loopholes that is leaving us extremely out of pocket.

    Reply

News

Parliamentary approval for pub chef
News

Parliamentary approval for pub chef

The Bladebone owner and chef is in the running for an award

 
Rural home needed for bouncy Belleek
News

Rural home needed for bouncy Belleek

Sweet-natured Belleek is desperate to find active owners

 
News

Drinkers' dozen makes it into Camra guide

 
News

Boundary Road to close from 6pm tonight

 
News

Drug dealer caught in Newbury jailed