Legal review with Charles Lucas and Marshall

Monitoring employee communications

Andrew Egan

Andrew Egan of Charles Lucas and Marshall

A RECENT case involving the messaging service WhatsApp raises issues about the monitoring of staff communications by
employers, says Andrew Egan of Charles Lucas & Marshall.

In March, the FCA issued a large fine to a former Jefferies’ investment banker for using WhatsApp to disclose
confidential client information to a friend and to a client.

Some of the information that the banker disclosed concerned a client company which was a competitor of the client to whom he sent the WhatsApp messages.

The messages were discovered when the banker voluntarily handed over his phone as part of an investigation into an
unrelated complaint against him.

He was suspended pending a disciplinary investigation, but he resigned before a decision was made about his

When deciding to monitor employees’ use of IT and social media in the workplace, there are a number of matters to consider in accordance with the Data Protections Act 1998 as well as the European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act 1998.

Employees are allowed some degree of privacy in relation to their conversations at work.

The main issue will be whether the employee had a reasonable expectation of privacy and whether or not the monitoring was in accordance with the law.

It is important for an employer to have a clear and well-publicised IT policy in place, setting out the extent to which the employees’ IT usage will be monitored.

This would also have to include up-to-date details of the types of messages that would be monitored in order for it to be carried out lawfully.

The employer’s monitoring should go no further than necessary to investigate any alleged misconduct and to ensure that other areas of an employee’s email or internet usage that are not relevant, are ignored.

Employers are recommended to provide staff with information in relation to the circumstances in which monitoring may take place, the nature of the monitoring, how the information will be used, and the safeguards in place for employees.

Employers may breach the implied duty of trust and confidence by inappropriate monitoring.

This could justify an employee resigning and claiming constructive unfair dismissal.

Similarly, an employer who just relies on evidence obtained through illicit monitoring as the basis for dismissing an employee, may render such a dismissal unfair.

If an employer believes that confidential information is being disclosed by employees inappropriately, then the employer should consider monitoring employee communications, provided that such monitoring is proportionate and that it does not extend to areas which are not relevant to its concerns.

Employers should have an electronic communications policy, which may extend beyond monitoring, to set standards, cross-refer to other relevant policies and to address the many risks and hazards arising from email use and internet access, including:

* Constructive dismissal

* Discrimination, harassment and defamation claims

* Intellectual property issues

* Contractual liability

* The loss of productivity

For further information contact Andrew Egan on 01635 521212 or andrewegan@coffinmew.co.uk

Leave your comment

Share your opinions on Newbury Weekly News

Characters left: 1000


By Helena Taylor, paralegal in the Gardner Leader dispute resolution team

What is undue influence?

Legal Question Time with Gardner Leader

Offer of the Week

Offer of the Week

No joining fee for corporate membership


Instagram is a Gift for Hannah as her turnover triple in a year


Newbury firm secures £10m investment



20 years of helping businesses grow