go

Concern over cumulative impact of Thatcham housing scheme

West Berkshire Council cites need for more school places and green space to meet demand

John Herring

Reporter:

John Herring

Email:

john.herring@newburynews.co.uk

Contact:

01635 886633

75 home plan from Thatcham submitted

THE impact of 75 new homes in Thatcham has been questioned by West Berkshire Council.

Bloor Homes Southern wants to build the homes on land east of Tull Way and north of the Henwick Worthy Sports Ground, 40 per cent of which will be affordable.

The development would be accessed off Tull Way. The scheme also includes flood alleviation works to the south of the site and public open space at the western edge.

Commenting on the application, West Berkshire Council officers have laid out their concerns for the development’s impact on the town.

The council’s grounds maintenance manager, Stewart Souden, has objected, saying that the area set out as public open space does not best meet Thatcham’s needs.

Mr Souden said: “Thatcham parish has a relative abundance of public open space. What Thatcham needs, however, is more areas for outdoor sport.

“There is an opportunity here to provide another sports pitch instead of just an informal open space area that could be serviced from the adjacent Henwick Worthy sports ground. That site cannot currently cope with demand for pitches at peak times.”

Mr Souden said that his objection could be overcome, however, if a sports pitch were built on land to the south of the homes, instead of the public area proposed to the west.

The impact of the new homes is also causing concern in the council’s education team.

Strategic commissioning and compliance team leader Fiona Simmonds said that 27 primary and 12 secondary school pupils were anticipated from the development.

The council is awaiting the outcome of a planning appeal after it turned down plans for 265 homes near Heath Lane and Cold Ash Hill.

Mrs Simmonds said there were concerns on the cumulative impact on schools in the event of the council losing the appeal. 

“The secondary catchment school [Trinity] will struggle to accommodate catchment pupils once the higher primary year groups reach the secondary phase, within the next three to four years,” Mrs Simmonds said.

The council’s highways officers said that the layout of the development would need to be revised before it could recommend approval.

The site, classed as greenfield and within the town boundary, was not listed as a preferred option for development in the council’s development plan document (DPD).

Bloor Homes said that the DPD only looked at sites outside of settlement boundaries and that the sustainable location was suitable for development.

More than 30 objections from residents have been received by the council.

The application will be determined at a planning committee should the council recommend approving the plans. A decision was due on May 31.

Leave your comment

Share your opinions on Newbury Weekly News

Characters left: 1000

Article comments

  • Andrewmo

    21/06/2016 - 14:02

    In this case it is the greedy farmer once more selling land for development. It's not in the DPD. If it's not in the DPD it should not even be considered. Thatcham Council said no, West Berks council said no, the schools said no, local residents said no. This has been going on for years now. Someone needs to make a decisive decision once and for all and say NO.

    Reply

  • PhilW

    21/06/2016 - 14:02

    I am always suspicious of public open space in developments like this - how many of them remain in the ownership of the developers, ripe for further building in a few years time?

    Reply

  • SaveWestBerks

    21/06/2016 - 10:10

    The site is one of the few areas left across the Newbury & Thatcham divide. It's Greenfield land. It's not a in the Planning Policy for a preferred site for development (a policy written by WBC). The town cannot accommodate the required school places this would generate. There's insufficient playing areas. The transport link is insufficient. This is a straight forward refusal! WBC need to start protecting West Berks and it's residents. Building on every piece of land is not helpful to anyone.

    Reply

  • NewburyLad

    21/06/2016 - 07:07

    Stop importing people then! It's out of control.

    Reply

    • Custos planeta

      21/06/2016 - 21:09

      Yep.

      Reply

    • Custos planeta

      21/06/2016 - 21:09

      Yep.

      Reply

News

Newbury FC sign lease extension to avoid eviction
News

Newbury FC sign lease extension to avoid eviction

Football club perform U-turn after council threatens legal action

 
Aldermaston man charged following affray in Thatcham
News

Aldermaston man charged with affray following incident in Thatcham

Man bailed after altercation earlier this year

 
News

Woman trapped in A34 collision just south of Chieveley

 
Hampshire

Tributes paid to late Tadley borough councillor

 
News

Man's lucky escape on A34 after car crashes into tree