go

Thatcham residents rally to oppose flats plan

Objections include overlooking and concerns over traffic

Thatcham residents rally to oppose flats plan

RESIDENTS in a Thatcham cul-de-sac have rallied together to oppose plans for four flats to be built there.

People in Stroller Close and Winston Way are against plans for the flats at 258 and 260 Benham Hill. The application, submitted by GAL Promotions, would see the two-storey building built in gardens behind the two properties. 

Access would come from Stroller Close and four car parking and eight cycle spaces were being proposed.

Residents have lodged 31 objections with West Berkshire Council’s planning department, citing traffic and being overlooked as grounds for refusal.

One resident, Terry Lawrenson, said that the already congested road would struggle to cope with extra cars.

“Owing to house building at the end of the cul de sac, there is limited parking available, nowhere to turn your car around and let’s just hope no one in our street needs a fire appliance – they just won’t be able to get down the road to the fire.

“Stroller Close is already struggling with access and the binmen often cannot access the road and therefore bins do not get emptied.

“It is totally unjustified that building works attached to Benham Hill can then have access granted to them from a different housing estate already stretched to capacity.”

Another resident, Linda Toop, added: “There are many children living on this estate and I feel before long there may well be the potential for an accident to occur whilst having to cross between parked cars.”

GAL Promotions said that the occupiers of 258 and 260 did not make full use of their present gardens and that similar development of long rear gardens had already occurred further east.

Resident Grace Ryder disagreed.

She said: “This can in no way be compared to the development of 27 and 28 Pegasus Close, which was constructed on to a circular close suitable for turning.

“The dwellings were two homes and not flats and were in-keeping with the existing homes and provided front gardens with driveways.”

The developer said that the layout had been designed to safeguard neighbours’ privacy, including glazed win-dows, and there was no significant overlooking from upper windows on the east elevation.

It said: “The proposal will make good use of under-utilised land to provide additional, and much-needed, small residential units to the district’s housing stock.

“The scheme has been designed with care to meet relevant planning policies and appropriate design guidelines and it will make a positive contribution to the area.”

To view the application search 16/02044/FULD in West Berkshire Council’s planning website. 

Leave your comment

Share your opinions on Newbury Weekly News

Characters left: 1000

Article comments

  • Scully

    05/09/2016 - 16:04

    Address for the on-line petition: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/stop-stroller-close-development

    Reply

  • Scully

    05/09/2016 - 16:04

    We have now started an on-line petition against this development, please join us in opposing the over development or our area. Details below: Petition against proposed development of 4 apartments to the rear of 258 & 260 Benham Hill to be accessed from Stroller Close. THIS AFFECTS ALL RESIDENTS OF WINSTON WAY, DOUBLET CLOSE, PEGASUS CLOSE, MILL REEF CLOSE AND SPECIFICALLY STROLLER CLOSE. Planning Application: 16/02044/FULD Re: The building of 4 apartments in Stroller Close. This letter is to ask for your support to a petition to STOP the proposed development in Stroller Close an already fully developed and densely populated area of our quiet cul-de-sac estate. Many residents have raised their objection to this development on the West Berks Council planning website highlighting the following concerns: • Loss of parking amenity for existing residents • Increased traffic through the estate • Increased parking on adjacent roads, blind corners, verges, pavements and opposite driveways • Po

    Reply

  • SteveGolf

    05/09/2016 - 11:11

    Check the councils webs site here http://planning.westberks.gov.uk/rpp/index.asp?caseref=16/02044/FULD Their are lots of objections including Thatcham town council

    Reply

  • grumpy

    05/09/2016 - 10:10

    This road looks very congested already, so I think they should say no. But, what is it with these cycle spaces. 8 cycles spaces. We are not all cyclists. Every proposed development seems to have cycle spaces now. Why ???

    Reply

Thatcham

Carol concert will boost cancer and renal unit appeal
Thatcham

Carol concert will boost cancer and renal unit appeal

Newbury concert in aid of West Berkshire Community Hospital Rosemary Appeal

 
Great Thatcham Santa Run gathering momentum
Thatcham

Great Thatcham Santa Run gathering momentum

Charity event set to be largest yet

 
Thatcham

Thatcham's Christmas lights to twinkle on Friday

 
News

Bin fire at Thatcham skate park

 
Thatcham

Thatcham Rugby Club supports children's charity