go

Parents' anger at school transport hike

West Berkshire Council set to raise cost by almost 200 per cent

Chris Ord

Reporter:

Chris Ord

Contact:

01635 886639

Parents' anger at school transport hike

WEST Berkshire parents have said they are “outraged” after discovering the cost of their child’s home to school transport is set to rocket in the next school year.

Parents of pupils at The Downs School have set up a petition after West Berkshire Council asked them to pay £700 for their child’s seat on the school bus from September 2017.

The cost for the same service for this school year was £250.

West Berkshire Council has, however, argued that the service has previously been heavily subsidised and in the face of unprecedented funding cuts can no longer afford the subsidy.

Chieveley parent Michelle Corr, whose daughter will be moving to Year 8 at the school next year, said: “I was shocked. I know the council have been subsidising it but they didn’t contact us at all so none of the parents have heard.

“There hasn’t been any consultation with parents at all.”

Debbie Carroll, who lives in Hermitage and hopes her daughter will be accepted by the school in September, said: “I found out through Facebook. I don’t know how they can justify such an increase.

“I’m sure it’s going to affect families. Even if you can pay in installments, it could be an extra £100 a month, which is a huge amount.”

The change in fare will affect around 60 pupils at the school who live in the catchment area but who live geographically closer to another school.

Mrs Corr added: “If we lived 0.2 miles up the road, then The Downs would be our closest school and we wouldn’t have to pay. It’s splitting villages in two.

“We just want the council to consult with parents and hopefully they can reconsider.”   

The petition has so far received 442 supporters and says the move is likely to lead to more parents choosing to drive their children to school, which could result in more accidents.

According to parents, there has already been concern raised regarding traffic bottlenecks at the school gates, as well as safety issues along the A34.

West Berkshire Council spokeswoman Peta Stoddart-Crompton said: “This is down to the current financial situation that we can’t continue to provide the subsidy.

“We do understand that this will have an impact on parents, however we have kept the subsidy going for as long possible.”

You can view the petition by searching ‘The Downs West Berkshire’ at www.change.org

Leave your comment

Share your opinions on Newbury Weekly News

Characters left: 1000

Article comments

  • NannyB

    12/09/2017 - 09:09

    Another example of beaurocracy gone mad. Why would you send your child to an area which possibly has different holidays to your catchment school thus creating another possible problem for child care. I thought the whole idea of a catchment area was so that your child would automatically attend there, perhaps someone from WB could explain then what a catchment area was actually for.

    Reply

  • streatley

    09/02/2017 - 13:01

    BerrysBottom Just out of interest - who did you use in Bucklebury? Streatley is in an identical position and we've come to the conclusion a private bus is cheaper.... Bleeding ridiculous. Especially as in Streatley our 'Qualifying School' stopping us getting the free transport is in Oxfordshire. And oversubscribed. If - however - the kids did get there, then Westberks would have to pay for the kids to get there and back...

    Reply

  • BerrysBottom

    06/02/2017 - 23:11

    Fair enough if they have to cut the free bus, but this happened in Bucklebury last year so the community pulled together to fund a community bus which costs a fraction per child of the £684 per year the council wanted to charge. But the 53 seater bus still comes every day, picking up the few children who pay and those entitled to free transport. So assuming that bus still costs the same as it did when it was full, what have the council actually saved?

    Reply

  • grumpy

    06/02/2017 - 13:01

    Its not an extra £100 a month, its £41.66. A tenner a week. So whats the big fuss. And why should council tax payers subsidise this service. For once I agree with WBC. :-)

    Reply

News

Man jailed following suicide attempt drama
News

Man jailed following suicide attempt drama

Peter Kelly abused would-be rescuer, court told

 
"Offensive" objections to muslim centre plans
News

"Offensive" objections to muslim centre plans

"It’s a sad representation of Newbury"

 
News

Pupils faint during half-hour assembly

1comment

 
All Districts

Help find Geordie

 
News

Overnight closures for M4 this weekend