go

Thames Valley and Hampshire police officers issued with spit guards to use on suspects

Concerns raised about human rights and use on children

Jane Meredith

Reporter:

Jane Meredith

Contact:

01635 886637

ncncncncnc

THAMES Valley and Hampshire police have been issued with spit guards for use on suspects.

The spit guards are made from a light, see-through, breathable material that goes over a suspect’s head and contains a section that prevents the person from spitting.

TVP made the decision jointly with Hampshire Constabulary with the spit guards issued to front line officers from the start of this month (February), following training on usage.

David Hardcastle, assistant Chief Constable Operations on lead operations for both forces, said:

“Our officers put themselves at risk every day and we want to ensure that they have the appropriate equipment to deal with the challenges they face.

“Everyone should be able to go to work without the possibility of being assaulted, including being spat at.”

Since 1 April, 2016, a total 306 TVP officers have reported being assaulted by being spat at.

Of these, 30 officers reported being exposed to blood-borne virus contamination risk as a result of fluid from the subject entering their mouth, nose, eyes or open wound.

Hampshire police, who already use spit guards in custody, reported that since April 2016, a total 126 assaults involving spitting had been recorded, with the spitting of blood increasing.

Independent Human rights organisation, Liberty, has said the spit guards are “Cruel and degrading,” with concerns about using them on children.

Other criticism includes that spit guards are humiliating, could cause panic and would make it difficult to see if a person was having difficulty breathing.

Spit guards are used by 17 of the UK’s 49 police forces.

Spit guards will only be used on suspects who have already spat at officers, or who are thought to be about to spit, and only when a suspect has already been handcuffed, according to police.

Leave your comment

Share your opinions on Newbury Weekly News

Characters left: 1000

Article comments

  • Gazzo

    09/02/2017 - 15:03

    Quite right NoisyNortherner. I wonder how these people objecting would feel with a face full of spit, not knowing what it might contain.

    Reply

  • Gazzo

    09/02/2017 - 15:03

    Quite right NoisyNortherner. I wonder how these people objecting would feel with a face full of spit, not knowing what it might contain.

    Reply

  • Gazzo

    09/02/2017 - 15:03

    Quite right NoisyNortherner. I wonder how these people objecting would feel with a face full of spit, not know what it might contain.

    Reply

  • NoisyNortherner

    09/02/2017 - 12:12

    As much as they resemble the hoods used by the Americans in Guantanamo, I don't see a problem with these. As long as they are used proportionately (e.g. on people who have already spat as the article states), then they're entirely appropriate. The police have as much right as anybody else to work in as low a risk environment as possible.

    Reply

    • grumpy

      09/02/2017 - 16:04

      Indeed, spitting is a filthy habit, and people do it a lot. Disgusting. I was going through town one day, and a bloke suddenly spat to his side, where I was going past, very lucky he didn't get me :-(

      Reply

News

Box clever and give big softie Rocky a champion home
News

Box clever and give big softie Rocky a champion home

Champion boxer Rocky is appealing for a knock-out home

 
Hermitage development is on hold as plan is rejected
News

Hermitage development is on hold as plan is rejected

Application for 37-home scheme in village branded 'disappointing' by planners

 
News

'Amazing' support for charity Christmas fair

 
News

Newbury explosions 'could have been catastrophic'

3comments

 
News

Serial shoplifter dodges prison yet again

12comments