Newbury News Ltd. Print-Digital-Social

West Berkshire Council failing over affordable housing

District well short of its target of 1,000 extra homes by 2020

Chris Ord


01635 886639

West Berkshire Council logo

WEST Berkshire Council has been accused of “letting down local residents” as new figures show the cash-strapped local authority is failing to get anywhere near to meeting its affordable housing target.

With affordable homes desperately needed across the district, the local authority revealed in a new report that just 13 units had been completed in the final quarter of 2016/17.

The council has now admitted it will need to revise its annual completion rate if it intends to hit its affordable homes goal by 2020.

Liberal Democrat councillor Lee Dillon told members of the council’s executive committee last Thursday that the local authority had a “long, long way to go to even be half as good as it wanted to be”.

In total, 166 affordable homes were built in 2016/17, eight more than the previous year, however the council had set an annual target of 200.

This will now need to be increased to 225 in order to reach its target of 1,000 by 2020.

The council report revealed that the local authority is also missing its targets in other areas, including council tax and business rates collection, adult social care, processing benefit claims and affordable housing completions.

As a result, members of the council’s executive committee resolved to refer the worst performing areas to its Overview and Scrutiny Management Commission (OSMC) to help look at ways to improve.

Speaking at the executive meeting, Mr Dillon (Lib Dem, Thatcham North) said: “In terms of the recommendations in the report, we’re in support for the affordable housing and council business rates going to OSMC for greater scrutiny and hopefully through that come up with solutions to improve those outcomes.

“You say they are tough targets to meet – they may be tough targets to hit, but, in particular, the affordable housing target has been missed by so far, that even if you halved that target you’d still be half way from meeting it.

“So, for me, it’s quite clear on affordable housing we’ve still got a long, long way to go to even be half as good as it wanted to be.”

In response leader of council, Graham Jones, (Con, Lambourn Valley) said: “What we want to do is to move these targets forward.

“It would be very easy for us to set targets we could hit, but it wouldn’t be stretching the organisation.

“Yes, the housing target was ambitious, but I’m quite happy to work with you to help realise that we have to accept that some of it might be down to market conditions.”

Members of the executive also heard how the council had successfully exceeded its self-set targets in a number of areas such as safeguarding children and vulnerable adults, communities helping themselves, good state of repair for roads, child protection, bin collection and street cleaning.

In total, the council hit its targets in 30 of 44 areas.

Following the meeting, however, Mr Dillon remained critical of the Conservative-led council, asking how it expects to hit affordable homes targets having even failed to secure any affordable housing units on land it had given to developers for the Market Street Urban Village.

He said: “The Conservatives are hitting targets on services that are contracted out, like bin collections, but areas where they have control are seeing them failing local residents.

“The poor performance on providing affordable housing is of little surprise given that even when they give away land that they own they don’t insist on the required level of affordable housing being provided.

“If they don't do it with their own land how can we expect developers to also step up to the fix the housing crisis?”

Leave your comment

Share your opinions on Newbury Weekly News

Characters left: 1000

Article comments

  • Justin S

    03/08/2017 - 12:12

    In a way, the council haven't met the criteria , because there would be more involved that just building houses. The roads don't work and wont work any better with more homes, doctors surgeries and schools are bursting as is. Sustainable transport would cost more money , so unless this is also incorporated in the build, then just throwing up houses isn't the answer. We are all anti home building , for all of the reasons above. We have a lot of green belt areas , which unless you are Vodafone, is not allowed to be build on. Some towns do have a large amount of brown site, which here and surrounding areas, don't. Lets be honest, who wants to live in Croydon !!


    • PhilW

      04/08/2017 - 01:01

      There is no green belt land around Newbury - permission has been given to build all around the town (including around the Vodafone HQ). Thousands of houses have been granted outline planning - yet very few are being built. The developers hold the council to ransom bleating about it not being economically viable to build the 'affordable' housing they promised in order to get the outline planning through. The Market Street development is a classic example, Parkway was another.


    • EugeneStryker

      03/08/2017 - 13:01

      I am not anti-home building. I am anti building the identikit housing lacking any architectural thought, thrown up by profit driven private housing companies - I would like Newbury to be different to everywhere else. Sustainable transport, especially building segregated cycle lanes, is relatively inexpensive, requires much less maintenance and will reduce the many impacts of the reliance on cars.


  • EugeneStryker

    03/08/2017 - 10:10

    This starts somewhat on the assumption that a Conservative led council are interested in building affordable housing for the residents of Newbury, rather than selling or giving away land to their private sector chums who have no interest in affordable housing. Croydon's Brick by Brick and Sheffield's Sheffield Housing Company are just two innovative ways to tackle the problem. Also, it appears that these two schemes make the effort to design housing that isn't the identikit houses that we get from the usual big developers.


    • NewburyDenizen

      03/08/2017 - 12:12

      Think you've struck the nail on the head.