go

Anger over Stroud Green traveller camp

Illegal encampment cost tax payer more than £2,000

Chris Ord

Reporter:

Chris Ord

Contact:

01635 886639

Anger over Stroud Green traveller camp

TRAVELLERS who set up camp on Stroud Green last month are estimated to have cost the taxpayer more than £2,000.

The camp, which arrived on Saturday, August 19, had, in general, been considered to be “well behaved” by police, despite reports of residents being intimidated and public urination and defecation.

However, after the travellers ignored instructions to leave, West Berkshire Council was forced to obtain a court order to evict them, resulting in costs running into the thousands.

More than £14,000 has been spent on dealing with illegal traveller camps over the last year, according to council figures.

Discussing the Stroud Green encampment at a meeting of Greenham Parish Council last Wednesday, chairman Julian Swift-Hook acknowledged the “concern and distress” caused to local residents, but said the travellers had been moved on as quickly as possible.

He said: “Several residents contacted me during the six days the travellers encampment was on Stroud Green, telling me about antisocial behaviour on the part of the travellers, intimidating residents, driving recklessly across Stroud Green, urinating and defecating in public.

“I told residents to report the behaviour they had witnessed to the police.”

However, on attendance, police found no evidence of any criminal or antisocial behaviour, and so getting the travellers to leave remained a civil matter, in the hands of West Berkshire Council.

Around eight caravans parked on the council-owned green, after removing bollards close to the entrance to Newbury Racecourse.

Residents had been left frustrated at the seeming lack of action from the police and council to move the camp on.

After the travellers had left, one neighbouring resident, who did not wish to be named, questioned why the camp had been allowed to remain on the green for so long.

They told the Newbury Weekly News: “It took a week for the council to move them on. It was the height of summer, in the middle of the school holidays and we couldn’t use the green.”

However, Mr Swift-Hook said it had taken four days for council officers to obtain an order to move the travellers from the land.

The council had initially instructed the travellers to leave on Monday, August 21.

Mr Swift-Hook said: “It should be noted that this traveller encampment, which consisted mainly of travellers from mainland Europe, was considered by both the police and the council traveller liaison team to be well-behaved and friendly.

“There were no confirmed reports of antisocial or criminal behaviour according to the police, unlike the previous encampments in 2012 and 2013.”

It was after the 2012 issue that the council opted to place bollards around the green.

Options are being considered to improve the security at Stroud Green, but Mr Swift-Hook conceded there was no way to “100 per cent” prevent travellers camps setting up on public land.

West Berkshire Council spokeswoman Jo Bassett said: “The council has to find a balance between making its parks and public open spaces as accessible as possible for members of the public to be able to enjoy and also protecting them from unauthorised use.

“In the case of Stroud Green, the bollards that were removed have been concreted back into place.”

Leave your comment

Share your opinions on Newbury Weekly News

Characters left: 1000

Article comments

  • Oldmoaner

    02/10/2017 - 10:10

    Oh no criminal activity, what part of intentionally removing wooden posts from public property is not criminal damage with intent. What part of driving on a public park is legal. If it was a sole local person they would be locked up straight away. If a policeman caught me peeing in the park fixed penalty first offence, if Thames Water caught me putting sewage in a surface water drain more legal action. This again highlights the support for local residents by WBC it is time they made some decisions and acted immediately, they have left a key for this to continually happen. They must act hard and fast and move these people on as soon as they get here. These people stopped locals using their amenity by fear it is not right and the council did their normal bureaucratic nothing. Stroud Green is a lovely amenity and should be respected and protected by the Police and Council.

    Reply

    • Bombey

      02/10/2017 - 11:11

      IF a traveller was caught by a policeman urinating in public they too would get a fixed penalty. If you were reported to the police by a neighbour for peeing in the street you'd deny it & the police wouldn't take it any further. Same here.

      Reply

News

Man is jailed for burglary
News

Man is jailed for burglary

'the courts take a dim view of those who make the decision to commit these offences'

 
Young Lady offers huge potential as family dog
News

Young Lady offers huge potential as family dog

18-month old German Shepherd is slowly coming out of her shell

 
News

Council will get £1.17m from new homes

 
News

Teen motorist led police on car chase to avoid drugs bust

 
News

Over 80s parcels delivered with thanks