Newbury News Ltd. Print-Digital-Social

Town councillors cautious over camera

But members vote to purchase one worth up to £600

Fiona Tomas

Fiona Tomas

fiona.tomas@newburynews.co.uk

Contact:

01635 886639

Town councillors cautious over camera

NEWBURY town councillors were hesitant in making a decision over a proposal to buy a camera worth up to £600. 

At a meeting of the council’s policy and resources committee on Monday, January 14, members discussed whether to spend the three-figure sum on the camera, which would be used for press releases, the council’s social media channels and its website.

Despite unanimously voting in favour of the proposal, councillors struggled to see monetary value and megapixels through the same lens.

Tony Stretton (Con, Clay Hill) conceded that £600 was not a lot of money for the price of a camera, suggesting that a camera of a certain quality would help develop the town council’s work a lot more.

But opposition member Julian Swift-Hook (Lib Dem, Pyle Hill) remained cautious in resolving to spend hundreds of pounds if council staff were unknowledgeable about using it.

Mr Swift Hook said: “In order for the camera to be valuable, it has to be operated by somebody who knows what they’re doing with a camera worth £600.  

“I wonder, is it necessary to spend that much when, with current digital equipment, it’s amazing what you can get on a camera which costs £200.

“There’s no point in buying the world’s most sophisticated camera unless you actually know what you’re doing with it.”

Mr Stretton added that DSLR cameras – single lens reflex – were user-friendly and that it was “not difficult” to use them, despite comments from chairman Adrian Edwards (Con, St John’s) that he had problems using a mobile phone.

Leave your comment

Share your opinions on Newbury Weekly News

Characters left: 1000

Article comments

  • Justin S

    16/02/2019 - 08:08

    So they ask about a £600 camera, but what about all those hundreds of thousands of our pounds which lose transparency with its people of correct use of funds that sadly disappear into the limelight until its too late and they screw it all up ?

    Reply

  • NoisyNortherner

    15/02/2019 - 11:11

    They'd have been better buying a cheaper point and click camera and a tripod. Unless you know what you're doing, you don't need an SLR. Stability goes a long way when taking static pictures.

    Reply

  • I have no name

    15/02/2019 - 11:11

    I'm looking forward to looking at their social pages in the coming months and reviewing their photography skills! For the first time ever, i agree with Mr Swift-Hook, an SLR camera needs someone whom knows how to use it! Otherwise a 200quid point and click would have been more than enough for their requirements! Blimey they could have used a 50quid point and click or any modern smartphone!

    Reply

  • Owen1

    15/02/2019 - 09:09

    They have enough in their wages, but are afraid to spend around £600 on a camera?? Hypocrites

    Reply

Show more comments