Newbury News Ltd. Print-Digital-Social

'The country is demanding that politicians work together'

Newbury MP supports decision to talk with Jeremy Corbyn

John Herring

John Herring


01635 886633

Newbury MP: foodbank rise not entirely down to Universal Credit

Richard Benyon - Conservative

RICHARD Benyon has said that the Conservative Party must bury its fears of a Labour government led by Jeremy Corbyn and support the Prime Minister’s attempts to work with the opposition to find a Brexit solution. 

With the date of the UK leaving the EU on March 29 being missed, Theresa May’s Withdrawal Agreement not finding support for a third time, and MPs failing to find a preferred solution to Brexit, the PM has said that she will talk with the Labour leader to reach an agreement.

A short extension of Brexit has been agreed until April 12, and the UK will leave without a deal on that date unless another option is taken forward. 

Monday night saw MPs vote on four Brexit alternatives, a Customs Union, Common Market 2.0, a confirmatory referendum and parliamentary supremacy – but none found a majority. 

Mr Benyon voted for Common Market 2.0, which would mean remaining in the European Single Market and seeking a temporary customs union with the EU. 

He also voted for seeking a UK-wide Customs Union with the EU. 

The cabinet voted against delaying Brexit during a marathon meeting on Tuesday, but Mrs May is now seeking to negotiate with Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn to “break the logjam” in Parliament. 

Speaking on the latest twist, Mr Benyon said: “She has come up with a proposal which involves working with Labour and finding something Parliament can live with, which may involve Britain staying in a customs arrangement with the EU. I am keen to give her the opportunity to follow this through until the third week of May to see if we can land this.”

The Newbury MP said that Labour and the Conservatives had stood on a manifesto to respect the result of the referendum and that he believed it was “perfectly in our power” to work on.

“We will see what comes of it,” Mr Benyon said. “There are different views in the Conservative Party, Labour, families in West Berkshire... it’s an issue that has split the country down the middle.

“No party has a majority in Parliament. She has tried to work with Labour and reached out to others to try and find a way forward but this is different; this is reaching out to the main opposition party to try and find a way forward and to leave with a deal. 

“I still remain hopeful that it could pass with a couple of tweaks that would bring more Labour MPs across and placate some in my own party, and the DUP who voted against it, but the speaker is not being helpful in making sure that would happen.”

Mrs May’s decision to talk with Mr Corbyn has angered some Conservative Brexiteers, who see the move as giving Labour a greater say in the process and heading towards a softer Brexit. 

Mr Benyon said it was normal to speak with the opposition on certain issues.

“The idea of Jeremy Corbyn as Prime Minister is a horrendous prospect and would set us back decades,” he said. 

“The country is demanding that politicians work together and we have got to bury our worries about economic vandalism and the bizarre, extremist views that he and those around him have to find a solution to this problem.”

The political drama of Monday night saw Nick Boles MP resign from the Conservative Party in the Commons, saying that his party had refused to compromise.

When asked whether there would be further splits among the Conservatives, Mr Benyon said: “My party has been split on Europe for most of my life.

“He [Nick Boles] was brought up in Englefield and is a very close personal friend but I think there’s going to be a leadership battle and I regret that he will no longer be eligible to take part in that as I will as a backbencher... are there going to be more? I don’t know, I hope not.”

On the prospect of a general election, Mr Benyon said: “It’s got to be a possibility. I don’t think people want an election. I don’t think Labour want it or we want it. People just want politicians to get on with it and to resolve this matter.”

Leave your comment

Share your opinions on Newbury Weekly News

Characters left: 1000

Article comments

  • SeniorMoment

    06/04/2019 - 10:10

    The only people who can sort this mess out are the ones who created it, the electorate. At least the lies have been exposed and the preferences seem to be a straight "Out at all costs" and Remain


  • Kayaker Pete

    04/04/2019 - 11:11

    "The Newbury MP said that Labour and the Conservatives had stood on a manifesto to respect the result of the referendum and that he believed it was “perfectly in our power” to work on." Say one thing, but do another. Benyon's voting record on Brexit demonstrates the contempt he has for the electorate. IMHO he is only interested in maintaining the large CAP payment his family trust benefits from each year. I won't be voting for this liar again.


  • NWNThatcham

    04/04/2019 - 09:09

    You have consistently voted against all motions and amendments that would take no-deal off the table, and so it looks like we will crash out in a few days time in which case you will own this disaster. No-deal will be devastating for the country and W.Berks - you say it yourself on your website and spoke against it in Parliament. Yet time and time again you put party before your constituents or the country and vote in such a way that no-deal likelihood increases. Your pathetic attempts of claiming compromise are too little, inconsequential, and far too late: any deal that now passes without a confirmatory public vote will cause permanent division in the country and poison politics for generations to come. At least Nick Boles has the principles to leave the CONparty and is starting to speak freely - disclosing that Robbie Gibb (ex-BBC) and now head of Govt Comms is a 'hard brexiter'. The truth of the Brexit corruption will emerge in time.


  • NoisyNortherner

    03/04/2019 - 15:03

    What May is doing now (assuming there isn't some ulterior motive) is what should have been done at the start of the process. Instead we've spent the fat end of 3 years watching the Tories tear themselves apart over this.


Show more comments