Newbury News Ltd. Print-Digital-Social

Richard Benyon rebels against Government in no deal vote

'I voted to make it absolutely clear so that we would not be leaving without a deal and putting the needs of my constituency first'

John Herring

John Herring

john.herring@newburynews.co.uk

Contact:

01635 886633

Newbury MP: foodbank rise not entirely down to Universal Credit

Richard Benyon - Conservative

RICHARD Benyon rebelled against his party line last night after the Government was forced to whip its own MPs into voting against its own motion. 

The Government had proposed a motion to not leave the EU without a deal on March 29, but included the option of a no-deal Brexit at a later time. 

But before the main vote, MPs backed an amendment to reject the UK leaving without a deal under any circumstances by a majority of four. Mr Benyon was absent from the vote. 

However, the vote is not legally binding as the UK could still leave without a deal on March 29. 

MPs then voted down the Malthouse compromise, proposed by North West Hampshire MP Kit Malthouse, to delay Brexit until May 22 to enable a managed no-deal Brexit. 

Again, Mr Benyon was absent from the vote. 

The results meant that the Government's proposal had to be changed to include no deal under any circumstances, with Conservative MPs being whipped into voting against the motion.

Mr Benyon defied the party whip and voted for the amended motion. 

Reading West MP Alok Sharma, Mr Malthouse and Wokingham MP Sir John Redwood voted against the amended motion. 

Explaining his reasons, Mr Benyon said: "I have tried to be consistent throughout. I will continue to vote for the Prime Minister's deal at every opportunity I get.

"I am respecting the result of the referendum, but the referendum did not ask us whether we wanted to leave with or without a deal. 

"Leaving without a deal would be very damaging to my constituency, so I was not happy with the Government's amendment last night because I thought it was equivocal.

"I voted to make it absolutely clear so that we would not be leaving without a deal and putting the needs of my constituency first. 

"I think that the Government amendment would have been seen from both directions. That's not what the Prime Minister said the previous night and therefore I voted the way I did."

When asked why he abstained from the Malthouse compromise, he said: "I am a good friend and admirer of Kit Malthouse but I don't think his option will work because the EU has said it won't work, therefore I was not going to support it and I didn't want to vote against it as I think Kit has done a good job of bringing people across Parliament together. 

"It came down to the Government motion as amended. I couldn't vote against that and I couldn't vote against him and his amendment, which meant voting against my party whip."

MPs will vote today on whether to extend Article 50 past March 29. 

Theresa May has indicated that she will try and push her twice-defeated deal through the Commons again, although an amendment has been tabled to stop this.

Mr Benyon said: "I will continue to support the Prime Minister leaving with a deal. If that comes to a vote next week then I will totally support it. 

"I think the deal is perfectly good enough to all those who voted to leave the EU and those, who like me, voted to remain."

But when asked whether he should back his remain-voting constituency, Mr Benyon said: "I am a democrat. It was a national referendum and my side lost.

"Many, many more constituencies voted leave than remain. On that basis we would have left with the hardest possible Brexit. People should be careful about what they wish for. 

"I am responding as best I can by supporting the result of the national referendum and that we leave sensibly with a deal."

   

Leave your comment

Share your opinions on Newbury Weekly News

Characters left: 1000

Article comments

  • dazzer

    27/03/2019 - 07:07

    When will you all understand - They are all committing High Treason - Bill of Rights 1688 is part of our constitution - "And I doe declare That noe Forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall within this Realme Soe helpe me God"....No matter what they say or do, they do not have the UKs best interest at heart - They are all self serving traitors - Here is Benyons Expenses for the last 5 years 1 Oct 2017 — 30 Sep 2018 Total claimed: £158,637.77 * Number of items claimed for: 222 5 May 2005 –1 Apr 2017 — 31 Mar 2018 Total claimed: £155,957.07 * Number f items claimed for: 231 1 Apr 2016 — 31 Mar 2017 Total claimed: £144,615.85 * Number of items claimed for:241 1 Apr 2015 — 31 Mar 2016 Total claimed: £140,895.62 * Number of items claimed for:219 1 Apr 2014 — 31 Mar 2015 Total claimed: £147,032.67 * Number of items claimed for: 238 Total £606,384.25

    Reply

  • dazzer

    27/03/2019 - 07:07

    When will you all understand - They are all committing High Treason - Bill of Rights 1688 is part of our constitution - "And I doe declare That noe Forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall within this Realme Soe helpe me God"....No matter what they say or do, they do not have the UKs best interest at heart - They are all self serving traitors - Here is Benyons Expenses for the last 5 years 1 Oct 2017 — 30 Sep 2018 Total claimed: £158,637.77 * Number of items claimed for: 222 5 May 2005 –1 Apr 2017 — 31 Mar 2018 Total claimed: £155,957.07 * Number f items claimed for: 231 1 Apr 2016 — 31 Mar 2017 Total claimed: £144,615.85 * Number of items claimed for:241 1 Apr 2015 — 31 Mar 2016 Total claimed: £140,895.62 * Number of items claimed for:219 1 Apr 2014 — 31 Mar 2015 Total claimed: £147,032.67 * Number of items claimed for: 238 Total £606,384.25

    Reply

  • NWNThatcham

    20/03/2019 - 09:09

    Looks like the Benyon has been outplayed by the ERG; he has left it far too late to start changing his mind to avoid a no-deal Brexit. He facilitated a no-deal Brexit from his support of approval of the A50 notification without any safeguard. A no-deal Brexit will be a disaster for W.Berks, and will see the eventual break-up of the United Kingdom. This will be Benyon's legacy.

    Reply

  • bruin the bear

    15/03/2019 - 12:12

    Leavers or remainers can at least agree that Parliament is a shambles at the minute!

    Reply

Show more comments