Newbury News Ltd. Print-Digital-Social

Newbury Town Council objects to converting Faraday Road into open recreational space

“Sport is clearly a much better use of the ground rather than general recreation"

Jonathan Ashby

Jonathan Ashby


01635 886637

What should happen to Newbury FC's Faraday Road ground?

NEWBURY Town Council has objected to plans to convert the disused Faraday Road football ground into a public recreational space.

Conservative-run West Berkshire Council (WBC) wants to convert the ground – which has stood empty since Newbury Football Club was evicted in July 2018 – into an open space, while also demolishing the now dilapidated clubhouse at a cost of £191,000.

More pay-and-display parking spaces would be installed, and the open space will remain until the district council gets the go-ahead to redevelop the London Road Industrial Estate.

WBC then plans to turn the open space into flats, while Newbury Rugby Club has been identified as the district council’s preferred site for a replacement sports facility.

However, the town council has objected to the conversion plans – with the only Conservative councillor on the committee, Jeff Beck (Clay Hill), abstaining – on the grounds that the application would go against Sport England rules, which require a suitable replacement facility for Faraday Road to be built before any development or demolition can start.

The council also objected on the grounds that there were no adequate toilet facilities for the proposed development – a reason why Sport England currently has a holding objection to the development until the district council offers a solution.

In a town council planning and highways meeting on January 6, councillor Vaughan Miller (Lib Dem, East Fields) questioned why it was tax payers footing the bill for the proposed development.

He said: “To me I feel the demolition is another example of West Berkshire Council using taxpayers’ money to subsidise potential developers.

“If they want this to be developed, which they clearly do, why are they spending £200,000 doing this demolition?

“That would normally be a developer’s cost.

“They seem to think with the amendments that a poster with directions to a toilet a quarter of a mile away in the Wharf would be sufficient to meet the Sport England objection.

“I don’t think that’s good enough.”

David Marsh (Green, Wash Common) added: “I endorse everything councillor Miller has just said.

“This is not acceptable and it goes completely counter to the strategy of this council.

“The councillors responsible admitted there was no demand for this facility whatsoever, it’s just trying to get them off the hook because of the constant way this disastrous policy has been pursued by successive Conservative councils and we should have nothing to do with it.

“We should strongly object to it, regardless of what happens sometime or another at the rugby club.”

The town council also objected to the change in description of the site from “public recreational sport” to just “public recreation”.

Roger Hunneman (Lib Dem, Wash Common) said: “Sport is clearly a much better use of the ground rather than general recreation.

“About 100 yards further walk there is Victoria Park which is available for public recreation and is well looked after.

“I personally feel this area should be used for sport.”

Leave your comment

Share your opinions on Newbury Weekly News

Characters left: 1000

Article comments

  • Newbury boy

    15/01/2021 - 09:35

    The Tories on WBC seem to see developer profits as the most important factor for any development. How about putting the needs of residents first for a change.


  • ScouseTony

    14/01/2021 - 13:38

    Well done Newbury Town Council, great to see cross party unity against these ridiculous plans to destroy a much loved community football ground. The Council know that can re-open it for organised football for half the cost of demolishing it, so why are they doing this?


  • From Luddite Lodge

    14/01/2021 - 10:32

    Good for Newbury Town Council, time for Newbury to run it's own affairs and not be dictated to by these old idiots from Bucklebury, Streatly and Chievely . WBC needs to be trimmed back, nothing but an excuse for a load of incompetence masquerading as public service