PC Andrew Harper: Court of Appeal judges refuse to lengthen jail terms for killers
But trio's bid to have sentences reduced is also rejected
A JUDGE has refused to extend PC Andrew Harper's teenage killers' "lenient" sentences today.
The decision will cause further heartache for his devastated widow.
However, in a crumb of comfort, they also rejected defence pleas to lessen the jail terms.
The Court of Appeal dismissed challenges by the Attorney General and the trio, ruling that their sentences will remain the same.
Henry Long, 19, from College Piece, Mortimer, was sentenced to 16 years and 18-year-olds Jessie Cole and Albert Bowers were handed 13 years in July over the death of the Thames Valley Police traffic officer.
Pc Harper, 28, was caught in a strap attached to the back of a car driven by Long and dragged to his death down a winding country road as the trio fled the scene of a quad bike theft in Stanford Dingley on the night of August 15, 2019.
Long – the leader of the group – admitted manslaughter, while passengers Cole and Bowers, from Paices Hill, Aldermaston, and Windmill Corner, Mortimer Common, respectively, were convicted of manslaughter after a trial at the Old Bailey.
All three were cleared of murder by the jury, which deliberated for more than 12 hours.
At a hearing in November, Attorney General Suella Braverman said the trio’s sentences should be increased, for an offence that was “as serious a case of manslaughter as it is possible to envisage”.
But lawyers representing Long, Cole and Bowers, who appeared by video link from HMP Belmarsh, argued that their sentences were too long and should be reduced.
This morning, Dame Victoria Sharp – sitting with Lord Justice Holroyde and Mr Justice William Davis – dismissed the Attorney General’s application to increase the trio’s sentences.
The decision was branded “disappointing” by Pc Harper’s widow Lissie who is campaigning for those who kill emergency workers to be jailed for life.
In a statement, she said: “I am of course disappointed with this outcome and ultimately feel along with the Attorney General and the majority of our country that these sentences are far too lenient, that they do not reflect the severity and barbarity of the crimes they committed.
“I continue to feel let down by our justice system and the inadequate laws that we have in place.
“My husband was killed in a barbaric way that has seen the nation shocked.
“This single act has rocked the lives of so many people who both loved Andrew and those who have watched from afar the heartbreaking story of his death.
“To take someone’s life surely should mean to have your own freedom taken in return. Yet these criminals will see the light of day far, far earlier than they ever deserve to.
“I remain more determined than ever to do what is right and to ensure we see what should have been in place so long ago.
“I know now more than ever the importance and requirement for Harper’s Law, which would see those who kill our emergency services heroes receive a life jail sentence.”
A spokesman for the Attorney General’s Office said: “The Attorney General challenged the sentences given to Pc Harper’s killers as she considered them to be too low, but she respects the decision of the Court of Appeal.
“Her thoughts remain with Pc Harper’s family for their unimaginable loss.”
The Court of Appeal also rejected Long, Cole and Bowers’ appeals against their sentences for manslaughter as “wholly unarguable”.
Cole and Bowers had also sought to appeal against their convictions for Pc Harper’s manslaughter, but this was also rejected as being “wholly unarguable”.
The Court of Appeal did reduce the sentences imposed on the pair for conspiracy to steal, from 38 months’ detention to an 18-month detention and training order given their ages at the time of the offence.
However, Dame Victoria said: “This does not affect the sentences for manslaughter and, because the sentences were concurrent, it does not affect the overall length of the sentences.”
She added: “The effect of our decision is that all three offenders remain convicted of the manslaughter of Pc Harper and the overall length of their custodial sentences remain unaltered.”
Speaking outside the Royal Courts of Justice after last month’s hearing, Mrs Harper said: “I stand before you with my heart as heavy as it was those many months ago when I stood feeling let down and angry outside of the Old Bailey.
“Yet today I feel pride in myself for not settling for something that I see as unacceptable.
“Proud to fight for my heroic husband Andrew, as I also continue to push for the safety and justice of his fellow emergency service protectors in the future.
“Today has been as harrowing as you can all expect, however we leave this court with at least a sense of balance.
“Reaching a step closer to a fair outcome is something that I have strived towards for a long time.
“We have all hoped and prayed that our beloved boy’s death will not go improperly unpunished.
“So we continue with our agonising battle for justice, a journey that we have had to endure for too long.”
At the hearing in November, Mrs Braverman told the court: “Pc Harper paid the ultimate price for his bravery and this should be reflected in the sentence.”
Referring to Long’s sentence, Mrs Braverman said: “A life sentence was the appropriate sentence for the first offender, who was and remains dangerous… if not in a case such as this, then when?”
Rossano Scamardella QC, representing Long, said Pc Harper’s death was the result of “a freakish accident” after he became attached to the back of the car, adding: “There was no intentional application of force or violence… there was no intent whatsoever to cause serious bodily harm or death.”
Timothy Raggatt QC, representing Bowers, said: “The idea that these sentences could be described as unduly lenient… is, to be blunt, far-fetched in the extreme.”